Print-grade parts.
Production-ready.
Shipped in 2–5 days.
SLA, SLS, MJF and DMLS metal — on industrial printers from EOS, HP and Formlabs. 20+ production-grade materials. Free DFM review, MOQ = 1, worldwide shipping.
Four 3D printing technologies.
Pick the right one.
Each process has different material properties, surface finish, and cost economics. The wrong choice can double your lead time or leave you with parts that fail in service.
SLA · Stereolithography
Uses a UV laser to cure liquid photopolymer. Smoothest surface finish of any 3D process, near-class-A cosmetic. Ideal for visual prototypes, display models, concept reviews and master patterns for vacuum casting.
Standard resin, tough (ABS-like), rigid (10K modulus), high-temp (238 °C HDT), flexible (Shore A 70), clear, biocompatible (Class VI), castable
Deep dive on SLASLS · Selective Laser Sintering
Laser sinters fine nylon powder layer by layer — no support structures needed, so complex geometries print at no extra cost. Functional parts, living hinges, snap fits, end-use brackets. Slightly rough surface, excellent impact resistance.
PA12 (nylon), PA11, PA12-GF (glass-filled), PA12-CF (carbon-filled), PA12-FR (flame retardant), TPU elastomer
Deep dive on SLSMJF · Multi Jet Fusion (HP 5200)
Inkjets fusing + detailing agents, fuses with IR. More isotropic mechanical properties than SLS. Faster for larger batches. Black parts have class-A appearance after bead blast. Production-grade for 1–10,000 part runs.
PA12, PA11, PA12-GB (glass-bead), PA12-GF, TPU, PP (polypropylene), ESD-safe variants
Deep dive on MJFDMLS · Direct Metal Laser Sintering
Laser melts fine metal powder. Enables geometries impossible in CNC: conformal cooling channels, lattice structures, topology-optimized aerospace brackets. Post-HIP and machining bring parts to flight-qualified condition.
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V, aluminum AlSi10Mg, stainless steel 316L / 17-4 PH, Inconel 625, Inconel 718, tool steel MS1
Deep dive on DMLSWhen 3D printing is the right call.
3D printing isn't a universal replacement for CNC or injection molding — but for the right part, it's 10× faster and cheaper. Here's when to choose it.
Complex internal geometry
Conformal cooling, internal lattices, hollow parts — impossible to machine, trivial to print. Metal 3DP dominates aerospace bracket optimization.
Fast-iteration prototypes
From CAD to part in 48 hours for SLA. Iterate 3× per week instead of 3× per month. Critical for startup hardware timelines.
Low-volume production (1–500)
Below ~500 parts, MJF/SLS often beats injection molding total cost because there's no tooling amortization. No MOQ, no setup charges per batch.
High-mix, low-volume parts
Dozens of different geometries in tiny quantities — ideal for medical, dental, and custom fixturing where every part is different.
Parts with undercuts or inaccessibility
Internal features CNC cutters cannot reach. Assemblies that 3D print in one piece, eliminating fasteners and tolerance stack-up.
Topology-optimized structures
Weight reduction via generative design. Metal 3DP brackets routinely 40–60% lighter than machined equivalents with equal stiffness.